Ist saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate in der Schwangerschaft sicher?

Related ingredients

Frequently asked questions

Ist saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate in der Schwangerschaft sicher?

No harmonised CLP reproductive classification (ECHA Annex VI) nor CIR or SCCS opinions flagging reproductive hazards for this type of botanical Saccharomyces ferment filtrate. No peer‑reviewed evidence was found indicating teratogenicity or reproductive toxicity for the combined "saccharomyces/(...root/...bark/...bud) ferment filtrate" as used in cosmetics; therefore default hazard and mechanism scores are 0 and topical exposure is judged negligible (evidence sources: absence of ECHA Annex VI harmonised classification; no CIR/SCCS assessment; no specific PubMed reproductive toxicity studies identified).

Ist saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate während des Stillens sicher?

Same rationale as pregnancy: no regulatory or authoritative safety assessments identify reproductive or lactation hazards for this ingredient as used in cosmetics. Systemic exposure from normal topical cosmetic use is expected to be negligible, and no evidence of breast‑milk transfer or lactation risk was located (sources: CIR/SCCS absence, ECHA Annex VI absence, PubMed search returned no relevant toxicology findings).

Ist saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate sicher für Babyhaut?

Hazard and mechanism remain 0 because no data indicate reproductive or developmental toxicity in infants. Exposure score increased to 1 for 0–3‑year‑old skin because infant skin has higher permeability and surface‑area‑to‑weight; although the ferment is an aqueous/complex botanical mixture (likely large/particulate molecules with low percutaneous absorption), absorption cannot be presumed zero for infants. No infant‑specific safety studies were identified (sources: CosIng listing style ingredient entries; lack of ECHA harmonised classification; no PubMed infant exposure data).

Wie bewertet VeriMom saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate?

VeriMom bewertet saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate mit 100/100 (keine bekannten Risiken) basierend auf EU CosIng, ECHA-Klassifizierungen und PubMed-Studien.

Was sind schwangerschaftssichere Alternativen zu saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate?

Siehe unsere kuratierte Liste der schwangerschaftssicheren Alternativen zu saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate basierend auf ähnlicher Funktion.