VeriMomIst lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract in der Schwangerschaft sicher?
No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
Related ingredients
Frequently asked questions
- Ist lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract in der Schwangerschaft sicher?
- No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
- Ist lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract während des Stillens sicher?
- No authoritative sources (harmonised CLP, SCCS, CIR) or peer‑reviewed evidence indicate lactation-associated risks or known transfer in milk for these botanical extracts. Topical cosmetic use is not expected to produce systemic levels of concern (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised classification), CIR (no assessment), PubMed (no signals).
- Ist lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract sicher für Babyhaut?
- No evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity specific to infants. Mechanistic concerns are not identified (m=0). Because infant skin has a higher surface‑area‑to‑weight ratio and less mature barrier, and botanical extracts are not completely non‑absorbable, exposure for baby skin is scored as low but measurable (e=1) even though adult topical exposure is considered negligible. Sources: CIR/ECHA (no hazards identified), general dermal absorption principles as applied in safety assessments (PubMed, CosIng/ECHA product data absent of reproductive flags).
- Wie bewertet VeriMom lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract?
- VeriMom bewertet lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract mit 100/100 (keine bekannten Risiken) basierend auf EU CosIng, ECHA-Klassifizierungen und PubMed-Studien.
- Was sind schwangerschaftssichere Alternativen zu lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract?
- Siehe unsere kuratierte Liste der schwangerschaftssicheren Alternativen zu lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract basierend auf ähnlicher Funktion.
Prüfe jede Zutatenliste in 2 Sekunden
Lade VeriMom kostenlos — scanne jedes Produkt und sieh sofort die Schwangerschafts-Sicherheitsbewertung.
Medizinischer Haftungsausschluss
Diese Informationen dienen ausschließlich Bildungszwecken und stellen keine medizinische Beratung dar. Sicherheitsbewertungen basieren auf öffentlich zugänglichen Daten und spiegeln möglicherweise nicht alle Risiken wider. Konsultieren Sie immer Ihren Arzt, bevor Sie ein Produkt während der Schwangerschaft oder Stillzeit verwenden.