Ist lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate in der Schwangerschaft sicher?

Related ingredients

Frequently asked questions

Ist lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate in der Schwangerschaft sicher?

No harmonised CLP reproductive classification (ECHA Annex VI) or SCCS/CIR safety opinion was identified for this specific multi‑botanical/microbial ferment filtrate. Individual plant components (e.g., Scutellaria, Camellia sinensis) are commonly used in topical cosmetics and lack harmonised reproductive hazard classifications; therefore, under CIR/SCCS/ECHA priority rules the default is no evidence of reproductive hazard for topical use. Sources checked: ECHA Annex VI, CIR, SCCS lists, CosIng and PubMed for reproductive toxicity signals showed no harmonised or definitive dermal reproductive hazard at cosmetic use levels.

Ist lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate während des Stillens sicher?

No regulatory or authoritative safety assessments (CIR, SCCS, ECHA Annex VI) indicate a breastfeeding-specific hazard for this ingredient as used topically. Systemic transfer via breast milk would require meaningful maternal systemic absorption—there are no data indicating that topical cosmetic use of this ferment filtrate delivers significant systemic levels. Sources: CIR, SCCS, PubMed, CosIng.

Ist lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate sicher für Babyhaut?

Hazard and mechanism: no specific infant/paediatric reproductive or developmental hazard data were identified for this exact ferment filtrate (no harmonised classifications). Exposure: because infant skin has a higher surface‑area‑to‑body‑weight ratio and less mature barrier, topical exposure is considered to produce higher potential uptake than in adults; therefore exposure score is increased by +1 (adult e=0 → infant e=1). Sources: general dermal absorption principles, CosIng, PubMed; no authoritative paediatric toxicity findings for this ingredient.

Wie bewertet VeriMom lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate?

VeriMom bewertet lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate mit 100/100 (keine bekannten Risiken) basierend auf EU CosIng, ECHA-Klassifizierungen und PubMed-Studien.

Was sind schwangerschaftssichere Alternativen zu lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate?

Siehe unsere kuratierte Liste der schwangerschaftssicheren Alternativen zu lactobacillus/rhodopseudomonas/saccharomyces/sucrose/(scutellaria baicalensis/coptis chinensis) root/phellodendron amurense bark/lonicera japonica flower/chaenomeles sinensis fruit/camellia sinensis leaf/brassica oleracea italica ferment filtrate basierend auf ähnlicher Funktion.