Безопасен ли saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate при беременности?

Related ingredients

Frequently asked questions

Безопасен ли saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate при беременности?

No harmonised CLP reproductive classification (ECHA Annex VI) nor CIR or SCCS opinions flagging reproductive hazards for this type of botanical Saccharomyces ferment filtrate. No peer‑reviewed evidence was found indicating teratogenicity or reproductive toxicity for the combined "saccharomyces/(...root/...bark/...bud) ferment filtrate" as used in cosmetics; therefore default hazard and mechanism scores are 0 and topical exposure is judged negligible (evidence sources: absence of ECHA Annex VI harmonised classification; no CIR/SCCS assessment; no specific PubMed reproductive toxicity studies identified).

Безопасен ли saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate при грудном вскармливании?

Same rationale as pregnancy: no regulatory or authoritative safety assessments identify reproductive or lactation hazards for this ingredient as used in cosmetics. Systemic exposure from normal topical cosmetic use is expected to be negligible, and no evidence of breast‑milk transfer or lactation risk was located (sources: CIR/SCCS absence, ECHA Annex VI absence, PubMed search returned no relevant toxicology findings).

Безопасен ли saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate для кожи малыша?

Hazard and mechanism remain 0 because no data indicate reproductive or developmental toxicity in infants. Exposure score increased to 1 for 0–3‑year‑old skin because infant skin has higher permeability and surface‑area‑to‑weight; although the ferment is an aqueous/complex botanical mixture (likely large/particulate molecules with low percutaneous absorption), absorption cannot be presumed zero for infants. No infant‑specific safety studies were identified (sources: CosIng listing style ingredient entries; lack of ECHA harmonised classification; no PubMed infant exposure data).

Как VeriMom оценивает saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate?

VeriMom оценивает saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate в 100/100 (без известных рисков) на основе EU CosIng, классификаций ECHA и исследований PubMed.

Какие безопасные альтернативы saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate при беременности?

См. наш список безопасных альтернатив saccharomyces/(achyranthes bidentata/angelica gigas/angelica pubescens/angelica tenuissima/asarum sieboldi/cnidium officinale/ledebouriella divaricata/paeonia suffruticosa) root/eucommia ulmoides bark/magnolia liliflora bud ferment filtrate с аналогичной функцией и классификацией без известных рисков.