lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract est-il sûr pendant la grossesse ?
No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
Related ingredients
Frequently asked questions
- lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract est-il sûr pendant la grossesse ?
- No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
- lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract est-il sûr pendant l'allaitement ?
- No authoritative sources (harmonised CLP, SCCS, CIR) or peer‑reviewed evidence indicate lactation-associated risks or known transfer in milk for these botanical extracts. Topical cosmetic use is not expected to produce systemic levels of concern (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised classification), CIR (no assessment), PubMed (no signals).
- lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract est-il sûr pour la peau de bébé ?
- No evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity specific to infants. Mechanistic concerns are not identified (m=0). Because infant skin has a higher surface‑area‑to‑weight ratio and less mature barrier, and botanical extracts are not completely non‑absorbable, exposure for baby skin is scored as low but measurable (e=1) even though adult topical exposure is considered negligible. Sources: CIR/ECHA (no hazards identified), general dermal absorption principles as applied in safety assessments (PubMed, CosIng/ECHA product data absent of reproductive flags).
- Comment VeriMom évalue-t-il lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract ?
- VeriMom évalue lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract à 100/100 (pas de risques connus) sur la base du statut EU CosIng, des classifications ECHA et des études PubMed.
- Quelles sont les alternatives sûres à lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract pendant la grossesse ?
- Consultez notre liste d'alternatives sûres à lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract basée sur une fonction similaire et une classification sans risques connus.
Vérifiez chaque étiquette en 2 secondes
Obtenez VeriMom gratuitement — scannez n'importe quel produit et voyez le score de sécurité grossesse instantanément.
Avis Médical
Ces informations sont fournies à titre éducatif uniquement et ne constituent pas un avis médical. Les scores de sécurité sont basés sur des données accessibles au public et peuvent ne pas refléter tous les risques. Consultez toujours votre professionnel de santé avant d'utiliser tout produit pendant la grossesse ou l'allaitement.