VeriMom¿Es lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract seguro durante el embarazo?
No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
Related ingredients
Frequently asked questions
- ¿Es lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract seguro durante el embarazo?
- No harmonised CLP reproductive classifications (ECHA Annex VI) nor SCCS/CIR safety assessments identify reproductive hazard for Lycium chinense, Carthamus (safflower) flower or Poria cocos extracts. Peer‑reviewed literature does not show convincing developmental teratogenicity from topical use of these botanical extracts. Therefore default no-evidence score is applied (h=0, m=0) and expected topical absorption from cosmetic use is negligible (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised entries for these extracts), CIR (no cosmetic safety assessment listing), PubMed (no relevant reproductive/toxicology signals).
- ¿Es lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract seguro durante la lactancia?
- No authoritative sources (harmonised CLP, SCCS, CIR) or peer‑reviewed evidence indicate lactation-associated risks or known transfer in milk for these botanical extracts. Topical cosmetic use is not expected to produce systemic levels of concern (e=0). Sources: ECHA Annex VI (no harmonised classification), CIR (no assessment), PubMed (no signals).
- ¿Es lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract seguro para la piel del bebé?
- No evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity specific to infants. Mechanistic concerns are not identified (m=0). Because infant skin has a higher surface‑area‑to‑weight ratio and less mature barrier, and botanical extracts are not completely non‑absorbable, exposure for baby skin is scored as low but measurable (e=1) even though adult topical exposure is considered negligible. Sources: CIR/ECHA (no hazards identified), general dermal absorption principles as applied in safety assessments (PubMed, CosIng/ECHA product data absent of reproductive flags).
- ¿Cómo puntúa VeriMom a lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract?
- VeriMom puntúa lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract en 100/100 (sin riesgos conocidos) según el estado EU CosIng, clasificaciones ECHA y estudios PubMed.
- ¿Cuáles son las alternativas seguras a lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract en el embarazo?
- Consulta nuestra lista de alternativas seguras a lycium chinense fruit/safflower flower/root/poria cocos extract según función similar y clasificación sin riesgos conocidos.
Comprueba cualquier etiqueta en 2 segundos
Descarga VeriMom gratis — escanea cualquier producto y ve la puntuación de seguridad en el embarazo al instante.
Aviso Médico
Esta información es solo para fines educativos y no constituye asesoramiento médico. Las puntuaciones de seguridad se basan en datos disponibles públicamente y pueden no reflejar todos los riesgos. Siempre consulte a su profesional de salud antes de usar cualquier producto durante el embarazo o la lactancia.